It required TVs to be fitted with either a built-in camera or a plug-in peripheral. Skype for TV was first unveiled at the CES tech show in January 2010 and was marketed as a way to let families “share the limelight so there’s no more huddling around the computer or missing an out-of-shot moment”. In addition, Xiaomi recently launched its own Mi Video Call service, and Slack has announced plans to add support for video chats to its popular business-focused chat tool.
Skype’s intention to focus its efforts on phones and tablets comes at a time when it faces heightened competition.Īlthough Google’s rival Hangouts service has had limited appeal on mobiles, Facebook’s Messenger and Apple’s Facetime apps are making more headway. It will continue to maintain the service until June.Īfterwards, it will be up to individual manufacturers to decide whether to remove the app or continue offering an unsupported service. The Microsoft-owned chat app said that the move reflected the public preference for using mobile devices to make video calls from the living room, despite the size advantage TVs offered. When so many people don’t even know how to turn off motion smoothing, what are the chances that they’re going to be mindful of security practices? It also illustrates how dumb some smart TVs can be.Skype has announced that it is ending support for its smart TV software. Or, as the Verge put it, "Samsung’s security reminder makes the case for not owning a Samsung smart TV. Going back still further, in 2013 Mashable reported that " Smart TVs can be hacked and compromised," with researchers at the Black Hat security conference demonstrating "how they found vulnerabilities in different 2012 models of Samsung Smart TVs that allowed them to turn on the camera, take control of social media apps like Facebook or Skype, and access files and basically any app on the set."Īnd so six years later this is not the way to address the issue. Surely such updates can be automatically applied? Last year, Samsung fixed a vulnerability after a consumer report claimed that smart TVs "could potentially be controlled by hackers exploiting easy-to-find security flaws." But even that vulnerability was described by experts as "low risk." And second, if there really is an issue, then a laborious series of remote control presses is not the way to address it. First, came the online response from the cybersecurity community, the risk is low and the advice is pointless.
0 kommentar(er)
